RESUMO
Work-related communication volume within the United Kingdom's National Health Service (NHS) has had little systematic research previously. The impact of communication volume on work-life balance of healthcare staff in the NHS is also not known and has not been an area of focus or governance. COVID-19 led to a shift to non-physical work, with greater reliance on digital communication for clinical decision making. We sought to elucidate the relationship between communication, work-life balance, and COVID-19. An online survey was conducted to assess the platforms used to communicate professionally, the volume of and time spent on work-related communications, how this has changed from before to during COVID-19, and the effect on work-life balance. A total of 3047 healthcare staff provided consent and evaluable data. Emails were reported as the most frequently used communication tool, and the majority of staff asked, reported increased work-related communications due to COVID-19. Staff estimated receiving 14 emails on an average day before COVID-19. During the pandemic, staff estimated getting approximately 17 emails on an average day and 29 emails on a busy day. Work communications reportedly took up increased amounts of family and home time during COVID-19. A large proportion (36%) of staff were unable to switch off from work-related communications already before COVID-19, worsening (57%) during the pandemic. Work-related digital communication is a vital component of working in the NHS. We provide the first detailed data on the types, volume, and impact of such communication on NHS staff during the COVID-19 pandemic, compared to pre-pandemic levels. We found that 82% of staff support the need for NHS guidance on work-related communications to help manage overload, protect emotional wellbeing, and increase resilience. Further work is urgently needed in this area to tackle the negative impact of communication technologies (technostress) on work-life balance to reduce staff stress, burnout, and turnover or early retirement of some staff.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disorder associated with an increased incidence and prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD), including myocardial infarction and heart failure. In addition to traditional risk factors, evidence suggests inflammation is critical to the pathophysiology of both conditions. Despite the association being well-recognised, challenges remain in managing cardiovascular risk in RA. AREAS COVERED: This manuscript analyses the association between CVD and RA and explores the limitations in evaluating cardiovascular risk in RA with available risk assessment tools. The authors review the optimal management of traditional risk factors such as hypertension and dyslipidaemia and contemporary risk factors such as inflammation and analyse the cardiovascular impact of RA medications. EXPERT OPINION: Analysis points to the critical role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of RA and CVD. It is well established that conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) improve cardiovascular outcomes; however, underlying risk often remains underappreciated. The authors suggest there remains an opportunity to improve mortality and morbidity with the early recognition and of at-risk populations and the timely initiation of appropriate cardiovascular and anti-inflammatory medications. More research is necessary into the role that imaging may play in stratifying risk and in the longer-term cardiovascular impact of biological DMARDs.
